brahmam
05-16 07:44 PM
Hi,
Once our 140 is approved in the sixth year of H1B, I learnt that we can seek a 3 yr extension. If that's the case, can we change companies during that 3 yr period or are we stuck with the same company that sponsored the 3 yr extension?
Thanks
Once our 140 is approved in the sixth year of H1B, I learnt that we can seek a 3 yr extension. If that's the case, can we change companies during that 3 yr period or are we stuck with the same company that sponsored the 3 yr extension?
Thanks
wallpaper how to curl curly hair
brook
07-02 03:57 AM
Hi,
I am looking for some advice regarding a seemingly peculiar situation.
my company has filed for my H1B this year alongwith h4 for my wife. My wife is on the verge of getting herself a job. My question is ...since this year's cap hasn't been reached....can she get a h1 visa and if yes how does her already having an application for h4 affect her h1b filing process.
I am looking for some advice regarding a seemingly peculiar situation.
my company has filed for my H1B this year alongwith h4 for my wife. My wife is on the verge of getting herself a job. My question is ...since this year's cap hasn't been reached....can she get a h1 visa and if yes how does her already having an application for h4 affect her h1b filing process.
bestia
07-20 02:40 AM
PERM takes from 2 weeks and upward. Mine took 9 months. Why? nobody knows. My friend's first PERM (eb3) took 6 months. Second (eb2) took 2 weeks.
You can file for I-140 (+ I-485) only after LC approval and if your date is current (for your country and your category).
You can file for I-140 (+ I-485) only after LC approval and if your date is current (for your country and your category).
2011 How To Curl Natural Hair
Blog Feeds
09-11 12:00 PM
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released an updated H-1B cap count of 45,100 as of August 28, 2009. This reflects an increase of 100 cases from the prior count, provided on August 14, 2009. The advanced-degree cap remains at 20,000. The USCIS continues to accept FY2010 H1B cases under the advanced-degree and regular caps.
We suggest to US employers to file H-1B Petitions only if they can able to provide the Client details like Letter from the end-client, Work-orders confirming the placement. If you are having an in-house requirement, provide USCIS with ample proof of your in-house requirements. Considering the flood of H-1B RFEs, we have to be bit cautious in filing works. The standard approach prevailing until last year needs a re-look. Be assured, if you are right on papers and abide the Immigration requirement, you will for sure come with flying colors. We will be happy to help and support you in H-1B and other filings. It is widely believed that the H-1B Cap will be available even after Sept. 30, 2009.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/09/h1b_cap_update_1.html)
We suggest to US employers to file H-1B Petitions only if they can able to provide the Client details like Letter from the end-client, Work-orders confirming the placement. If you are having an in-house requirement, provide USCIS with ample proof of your in-house requirements. Considering the flood of H-1B RFEs, we have to be bit cautious in filing works. The standard approach prevailing until last year needs a re-look. Be assured, if you are right on papers and abide the Immigration requirement, you will for sure come with flying colors. We will be happy to help and support you in H-1B and other filings. It is widely believed that the H-1B Cap will be available even after Sept. 30, 2009.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/09/h1b_cap_update_1.html)
more...
Radha123
12-04 04:19 AM
Hi,
I am working on L1 from Company A.
I have applied for L1 to H1 status for year 2008 from comany B. H1 got approved without COS. As COS not done, I continued working on L1 with company A. Now my L1 is getting expired on Aug 2010 and my L1 company want to extend L1.
While applying for my L1 extention, my H1 applival cause any problem.
Please help me to get more info on this. Please let me know if you need more details on this.
Thanks.
I am working on L1 from Company A.
I have applied for L1 to H1 status for year 2008 from comany B. H1 got approved without COS. As COS not done, I continued working on L1 with company A. Now my L1 is getting expired on Aug 2010 and my L1 company want to extend L1.
While applying for my L1 extention, my H1 applival cause any problem.
Please help me to get more info on this. Please let me know if you need more details on this.
Thanks.
glamzon
05-24 10:39 AM
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:S.1348:
click amendments.
These get updated every while and then when they are introduced . keep monitoring and update the core team if you find something . thanks
click amendments.
These get updated every while and then when they are introduced . keep monitoring and update the core team if you find something . thanks
more...
vandanaverdia
09-26 01:45 AM
It will be great to have everyone from WA & OR call in so that we can discuss & kickstart the fall campaign.
2010 How To Curl Hair With Straighteners. Loose Curls Hair Tutorial
Radiance
05-03 01:23 PM
Hey, I sent you an Application a few days ago
more...
semiGator
12-24 10:28 AM
Has this got anything to do with the employee-employer relationship and the Neufeld memo?
hair Short Natural Curl Hair
Blog Feeds
12-10 05:20 PM
The Center for American Progress has released a report that urges an end to the "arbitrary restrictions" on H-1B visas and replacing the 65,000 quota with a market-based system where numbers rise in a strong economy and drop in a weak one. The report also recommends stronger enforcement mechanisms to prevent fraud and abuse.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/12/report-urges-liberalizing-h1b-quotas-but-also-tougher-enforcement-of-rules.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/12/report-urges-liberalizing-h1b-quotas-but-also-tougher-enforcement-of-rules.html)
more...
coolest_me
04-18 04:30 PM
I m not sure but I think he has to wait till he gets his citizenship . The other way to apply for Tourist or student visa. Tourist visa will be for short time and student visa will be hard to get if the Husband is Green Card holder.
Again, I m not 100% sure of this. some experienced people may be able to give you detailed information
Again, I m not 100% sure of this. some experienced people may be able to give you detailed information
hot how make curly hair
jackrabbit
03-27 11:34 AM
If I resign, If my employer cancels my I-140 and use that labor and PD for another person within next 3 months. Can I still use the same priority date if I reach to the I-140 stage in the next 9 months at the new employer?
I have a nice offer from a reputed company but am worried that my current employer (small-time consulting company) would revoke 140 for the purpose of substituting it...Otherwise they have no problem with me but then it is a business for them.
I asked them if it is not illegal/immoral to do that. Their reply was that it is illegal only to sell it and not if it is given away as a favor and they seem to have folks waiting on the sidelines...
I am waiting for that law to ban it but it does not seem to happen...
* Moving question to new thread since the question got buried by subsequent posts
TIA!
I have a nice offer from a reputed company but am worried that my current employer (small-time consulting company) would revoke 140 for the purpose of substituting it...Otherwise they have no problem with me but then it is a business for them.
I asked them if it is not illegal/immoral to do that. Their reply was that it is illegal only to sell it and not if it is given away as a favor and they seem to have folks waiting on the sidelines...
I am waiting for that law to ban it but it does not seem to happen...
* Moving question to new thread since the question got buried by subsequent posts
TIA!
more...
house How To Curl Your Hair With A
jonty_11
06-21 05:23 PM
You will get RFE from USCIS if u have not taken all necessary veccinations.and u will have to take them then...
tattoo Best 5 Curly Hair Product
sixburgh
01-13 08:27 PM
I want to renew my AP. I wanted some input from all of you.
EAD renewals : normally expire after 2 years
What about AP?
Is it 1 year or 2 years?
EAD renewals : normally expire after 2 years
What about AP?
Is it 1 year or 2 years?
more...
pictures Quickly for moreto curl hair,
Macaca
07-31 05:23 PM
It's Time to End Or Reduce The Cloture Clog (http://rollcall.com/issues/53_15/guest/19599-1.html) By Robert Weiner and John Larmett, July 31 2007
Robert Weiner, president of Robert Weiner Associates Public Affairs, worked for 16 years in the House of Representatives and for six years in the Clinton White House. John Larmett, senior policy analyst at Robert Weiner Associates, was legislative assistant/press secretary to Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.) and former Sen. Gaylord Nelson (D-Wis.).
The Senate's cloture rule defeats democracy. It lets public servants hide and obfuscate behind a parliamentary quirk never intended by the framers of the Constitution. It's time to end or significantly change the cloture rule, as was last done in 1975, and move to a true democracy so that the House and Senate equally represent the American people.
There are checks and balances, the only ones the Founding Fathers stated and intended: a presidential veto, which Congress can override with two-thirds, the only supermajority specified in the Constitution; the courts; and elections. No one ever foresaw parliamentary sleight of hand as a block of the will of the majority. If Congress wants to restore Americans' confidence in its work from the current all-time lows, it needs to allow the system to work as common sense, the Constitution and the framers dictate.
During the April-May 2005 "crisis" on judicial nominations, the "Gang of 14," seven Democratic and seven Republican Senators, agreed to oppose the constitutional or "nuclear" option and to oppose filibusters of judicial nominations except in "extraordinary circumstances." However, the Senate has failed to cut off debate on other issues 57 times since then, making clear that the system has failed.
Democrats are right to scream Republican "obstructionism," but Republicans, when they were in the majority, also were right to scream Democratic obstructionism. Both sides use and abuse the rule when they are in the minority to create some supermajority fantasy the public will not understand - and then blame the other side for not getting a legislative agenda accomplished.
In last year's campaigns, House Democrats promised to change the way Congress does business - and do it within the first 100 hours they were in session. With a majority of 30-60 votes, but no supermajority requirement, the House passed its entire agenda. Despite majority support, hindered by the supermajority "cloture," the Senate has struggled all year just to pass a few bills. The American people get the feeling the Senate is a train that never quite leaves the station.
The slow train continued July 17-18 when Republicans scuttled a Democratic proposal ordering troop withdrawals from Iraq in a showdown capping an all-night debate. The 52-47 vote fell short of the 60 votes needed to invoke cloture, the 27th time this year alone that body has been unable to proceed on significant pieces of legislation. In the previous Congress (controlled by Republicans), Democrats were successful 34 times in blocking Republican legislation. Cloture has become the third rail of Congressional politics. It's time for the train to move on a different track.
Everyone has been properly complaining about obstructionism, but no one has said anything about changing the Senate rule on cloture. Since Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is talking about changing Senate rules to make it easier to restrict amendments on the floor, then why shouldn't the Senate also start the discussion about changing the cloture rule right now? It could be the difference in getting bills passed.
In early July, the minority's decision to filibuster the amendment by Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.), which stated that men and women serving in the military deserved the same amount of time at home that they served overseas, died on a 56-41 failed cloture vote - a majority supporting it but the media saying it "failed."
In 1975, the Senate reduced the number of votes required for cloture from two-thirds to three-fifths, and it should change it again. If not an end outright, the best approach to guarantee the will of the majority, why not at least drop the requirement to 55 votes - necessitating just a little bit of extra consensus to end debate. Let the will of the American people, and of a majority of the Senate itself, be acted upon.
It's time to end the cloture clog, regardless of who's in charge.
Robert Weiner, president of Robert Weiner Associates Public Affairs, worked for 16 years in the House of Representatives and for six years in the Clinton White House. John Larmett, senior policy analyst at Robert Weiner Associates, was legislative assistant/press secretary to Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.) and former Sen. Gaylord Nelson (D-Wis.).
The Senate's cloture rule defeats democracy. It lets public servants hide and obfuscate behind a parliamentary quirk never intended by the framers of the Constitution. It's time to end or significantly change the cloture rule, as was last done in 1975, and move to a true democracy so that the House and Senate equally represent the American people.
There are checks and balances, the only ones the Founding Fathers stated and intended: a presidential veto, which Congress can override with two-thirds, the only supermajority specified in the Constitution; the courts; and elections. No one ever foresaw parliamentary sleight of hand as a block of the will of the majority. If Congress wants to restore Americans' confidence in its work from the current all-time lows, it needs to allow the system to work as common sense, the Constitution and the framers dictate.
During the April-May 2005 "crisis" on judicial nominations, the "Gang of 14," seven Democratic and seven Republican Senators, agreed to oppose the constitutional or "nuclear" option and to oppose filibusters of judicial nominations except in "extraordinary circumstances." However, the Senate has failed to cut off debate on other issues 57 times since then, making clear that the system has failed.
Democrats are right to scream Republican "obstructionism," but Republicans, when they were in the majority, also were right to scream Democratic obstructionism. Both sides use and abuse the rule when they are in the minority to create some supermajority fantasy the public will not understand - and then blame the other side for not getting a legislative agenda accomplished.
In last year's campaigns, House Democrats promised to change the way Congress does business - and do it within the first 100 hours they were in session. With a majority of 30-60 votes, but no supermajority requirement, the House passed its entire agenda. Despite majority support, hindered by the supermajority "cloture," the Senate has struggled all year just to pass a few bills. The American people get the feeling the Senate is a train that never quite leaves the station.
The slow train continued July 17-18 when Republicans scuttled a Democratic proposal ordering troop withdrawals from Iraq in a showdown capping an all-night debate. The 52-47 vote fell short of the 60 votes needed to invoke cloture, the 27th time this year alone that body has been unable to proceed on significant pieces of legislation. In the previous Congress (controlled by Republicans), Democrats were successful 34 times in blocking Republican legislation. Cloture has become the third rail of Congressional politics. It's time for the train to move on a different track.
Everyone has been properly complaining about obstructionism, but no one has said anything about changing the Senate rule on cloture. Since Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is talking about changing Senate rules to make it easier to restrict amendments on the floor, then why shouldn't the Senate also start the discussion about changing the cloture rule right now? It could be the difference in getting bills passed.
In early July, the minority's decision to filibuster the amendment by Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.), which stated that men and women serving in the military deserved the same amount of time at home that they served overseas, died on a 56-41 failed cloture vote - a majority supporting it but the media saying it "failed."
In 1975, the Senate reduced the number of votes required for cloture from two-thirds to three-fifths, and it should change it again. If not an end outright, the best approach to guarantee the will of the majority, why not at least drop the requirement to 55 votes - necessitating just a little bit of extra consensus to end debate. Let the will of the American people, and of a majority of the Senate itself, be acted upon.
It's time to end the cloture clog, regardless of who's in charge.
dresses short curly hair style meg
gimme Green!!
06-17 02:36 PM
Is it still possible to file for I 140 and I 485 concurrently, now that its all Current now?
Thanks in advance!!
Thanks in advance!!
more...
makeup Curly hair, while gorgeous,
Blog Feeds
08-31 11:30 AM
A lot of nice tributes to Senator Kennedy recognizing his immigration achievements. Here are a few: Ted Kennedy's Greatest Accomplishment: He Created Americans - Dana Houle of Daily Kos talks about Kennedy's shepherding through the 1965 Immigration Act. From HIAS. From the National Immigration Forum. From the American Immigration Lawyers Association. From the Immigration Policy Center. From the Migration Policy Institute. Partha Banerjee in the McClatchy News Service And here is a speech Senator Kennedy gave in 2006 promoting his immigration reform bill:
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/08/tributes-to-kennedy-pour-in-from-proimmigration-community.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/08/tributes-to-kennedy-pour-in-from-proimmigration-community.html)
girlfriend How to: Curl your hair with
jonty_11
03-22 11:17 AM
If She herself would be asking teh question.. u would probably get some response.
hairstyles How to curl hair, curling iron
emnasty600
09-13 05:17 PM
I was entered into the United States when I was 8 years old. I was entered on the plane with a fake passport and ever since I've been using my real name. I used my real name for school and college. I'm currently here illegally. I want to start my process of application for citizenship but there is a problem. My lawyer told me to marry under the name i entered with and so i did. Before we started the application he realized i was finger printed under my real name so if i were to apply my finger prints would show already in the system. So the only solution is to change my fake name to my real name (which doesnt have a visa) on the marriage license. How do i go about doing so? and will i still be able to obtain a green card? I reside in massachusetts.
Blog Feeds
04-01 10:40 AM
Our friendly anti Jack has provided in the comments a couple of links to an intriguing story regarding Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele (currently embroiled in another scandal - this time involving strippers and GOP money - oy!). Steele has been one of the moderate voices in the GOP when it comes to immigration reform in the past and apparently he met with a pro-reform group called the Fair Immigration Reform Movement (FIRM). Accounts differ regarding whether Steele promised to work for immigration reform and, more specifically, help round up a second GOP Senator to sponsor the reform bill...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/04/gop-head-sort-of-promises-to-support-cir.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/04/gop-head-sort-of-promises-to-support-cir.html)
ilikekilo
05-18 01:12 PM
i believe so, however
this " The new I-94 would have the same date of departure as was in the previous I -94 " i dont know
this " The new I-94 would have the same date of departure as was in the previous I -94 " i dont know
No comments:
Post a Comment