smuggymba
03-07 03:04 PM
Hi Friends,
I work for a big 4 consulting firm and transferring my H1-B to a client (a 2 Billion dollar american company).......I'm planning to join my new company only after the visa has been transferred ........my questions are:
1.) If the transfer is rejected, can I work for my current employer (assuming I dont resign)
2.) My wife's on H4 and recently applied for COS from H4 to F1 - Do I need to file for her H4 transfer also or not?
Not sure what's the effect of H1 transfer on wife's pending H4 to F1 application.
Need help ASAP. Thanks a lot.
I work for a big 4 consulting firm and transferring my H1-B to a client (a 2 Billion dollar american company).......I'm planning to join my new company only after the visa has been transferred ........my questions are:
1.) If the transfer is rejected, can I work for my current employer (assuming I dont resign)
2.) My wife's on H4 and recently applied for COS from H4 to F1 - Do I need to file for her H4 transfer also or not?
Not sure what's the effect of H1 transfer on wife's pending H4 to F1 application.
Need help ASAP. Thanks a lot.
wallpaper Blueberry-Lavender Ice Cream
ashrock11
09-13 08:15 PM
Hi,
My I-485 case was approved on 7/23, got approval letter on 7/30.
In August I got the Code 3 Biometrics letter and now I got it for Code 2. Two Biometrics appointment within a month!
Does this usually happen? No CPO e-mails or card yet!
Thanks
My I-485 case was approved on 7/23, got approval letter on 7/30.
In August I got the Code 3 Biometrics letter and now I got it for Code 2. Two Biometrics appointment within a month!
Does this usually happen? No CPO e-mails or card yet!
Thanks
Eternal_Hope
04-16 03:35 PM
Hi - I am just wondering, if Medical residency applications are subject to the yearly 65,000 Quota? Does anyone know?
If the hospital (healthcare organization) is a non-profit body then they will not be subjected to the quota (I think). Maybe other members can validate this.
If the hospital (healthcare organization) is a non-profit body then they will not be subjected to the quota (I think). Maybe other members can validate this.
2011 Crunchy ice cream
Blog Feeds
11-08 03:30 PM
Is a person who was deported almost 30 years ago, and returned to the U.S. without inspection a year later subject to the permanent bar under the 1996 immigration law? The 1996 law created the permanent bar to the immigrating to the U.S. Section 212(a)(9)(C)(i)(II)provides as follows: "(C) Aliens unlawfully present after previous immigration violations.- (i) In general.-Any alien who- ...(II) has been ordered removed under section 235(b)(1) , section 240 , or any other provision of law, and who enters or attempts to reenter the United States without being admitted is inadmissible." The question is whether or not this...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2009/11/uscis-errors-who-should-bear-the-burden.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2009/11/uscis-errors-who-should-bear-the-burden.html)
more...
GIC
01-25 04:24 PM
Anybody used Silvergate Evaluations Inc for educational evaluation? Please post your advice/experience.
Thanks
GIC
Thanks
GIC
Raj2006
01-16 02:25 PM
can someone please reply?
thank you.
thank you.
more...
r_joe
02-08 09:48 PM
I am applying for an H-1B extension. The prevailing wage determined by icert is less than my actual salary by about $30,000. Will there be a problem if my salary is much higher than the prevailing wage?
2010 Passionfruit Ice Cream
gman
09-18 05:20 PM
I am on h1-b since Oct 1, 2004. I am EB3-ROW (Rest of World). My company has filed I-140 in June 2006 and it has not been approved yet. How soon would I be able to change jobs? I'm about to finish my master's degree and am hoping to get a job that falls in either eb-2 or eb3 category. How will this impact the ability to keep my i-140. Would i have to start from scratch with my new employer if i find a new job?
Also what is considered my priority date since I havent/cant file an i-485 yet.
Thanks
Also what is considered my priority date since I havent/cant file an i-485 yet.
Thanks
more...
ronhira
04-27 09:13 AM
do not try to contact aliens..... Stephen Hawking says Alien Contact Could Be Risky
Stephen Hawking: Alien Contact Could Be Risky - ABC News (http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Space/stephen-hawking-alien-contact-risky/story?id=10478157)
no problem, arizona state congress have a response plan to tackle all aliens. arizona just passed a bill to handle aliens - arrest everyone who don't look like us.... lets now look for the space ships....
Stephen Hawking: Alien Contact Could Be Risky - ABC News (http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Space/stephen-hawking-alien-contact-risky/story?id=10478157)
no problem, arizona state congress have a response plan to tackle all aliens. arizona just passed a bill to handle aliens - arrest everyone who don't look like us.... lets now look for the space ships....
hair Photo: White Pepper Ice Cream
glamzon
09-11 03:08 PM
close this thread ...
more...
go_guy123
03-07 08:07 PM
The Los Angeles Times reports that the President is pushing Senators Schumer and Graham to get their immigration proposal introduced. But many are skeptical the White House is serious.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/03/lip-service.html)
First try get healthcare done. If Obama cant even get the healthcare done, it even harder for him to do a CIR. His opponent gets the message that Obama and the democratic party is weak and insecure.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/03/lip-service.html)
First try get healthcare done. If Obama cant even get the healthcare done, it even harder for him to do a CIR. His opponent gets the message that Obama and the democratic party is weak and insecure.
hot Now, that#39;s one ice cream that
sravani
05-02 03:41 PM
You didn't indicate the reason why your friend's H1B got rejected. If the H1 got rejected due to the problems with the company sponsored the H1, then it's highly likely the new H1 will get approved.
more...
house Ice cream
a_paradkar
10-05 01:07 PM
I heard from my collegue that if your company is doing Lay Off's, then your 485 processing stops automatically.
is that true? can anybody confirm it.
My PD is Aug 2005, I40 Approved and 485 was filed in Set 2005.
Thanks
is that true? can anybody confirm it.
My PD is Aug 2005, I40 Approved and 485 was filed in Set 2005.
Thanks
tattoo Ice Cream
sxk
11-25 08:13 PM
What do one have to do to get a visa appointment in one of the US embassy's in Canada?
I have been trying to get a visa appt for last 6 weeks and I just could not. Any ideas are welcome. Please advice.
I have been trying to get a visa appt for last 6 weeks and I just could not. Any ideas are welcome. Please advice.
more...
pictures Download Free Ice cream
kirupa
10-08 01:03 AM
Hi icube,
Unfortunately, ChangePropertyAction today doesn't allow you access attached properties. I'll add that as something we consider fixing in a future release :)
Cheers,
Kirupa
Unfortunately, ChangePropertyAction today doesn't allow you access attached properties. I'll add that as something we consider fixing in a future release :)
Cheers,
Kirupa
dresses Coffee Hour: Ice Cream Party
RadioactveChimp
05-01 10:06 PM
eh it's alright...doesn't quite live up to your name though
you should've had a pic of kirupa and a pic of the alien and used the font from alien vs. predator :)
you should've had a pic of kirupa and a pic of the alien and used the font from alien vs. predator :)
more...
makeup chocolate-ice-cream-main
Macaca
07-31 05:23 PM
It's Time to End Or Reduce The Cloture Clog (http://rollcall.com/issues/53_15/guest/19599-1.html) By Robert Weiner and John Larmett, July 31 2007
Robert Weiner, president of Robert Weiner Associates Public Affairs, worked for 16 years in the House of Representatives and for six years in the Clinton White House. John Larmett, senior policy analyst at Robert Weiner Associates, was legislative assistant/press secretary to Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.) and former Sen. Gaylord Nelson (D-Wis.).
The Senate's cloture rule defeats democracy. It lets public servants hide and obfuscate behind a parliamentary quirk never intended by the framers of the Constitution. It's time to end or significantly change the cloture rule, as was last done in 1975, and move to a true democracy so that the House and Senate equally represent the American people.
There are checks and balances, the only ones the Founding Fathers stated and intended: a presidential veto, which Congress can override with two-thirds, the only supermajority specified in the Constitution; the courts; and elections. No one ever foresaw parliamentary sleight of hand as a block of the will of the majority. If Congress wants to restore Americans' confidence in its work from the current all-time lows, it needs to allow the system to work as common sense, the Constitution and the framers dictate.
During the April-May 2005 "crisis" on judicial nominations, the "Gang of 14," seven Democratic and seven Republican Senators, agreed to oppose the constitutional or "nuclear" option and to oppose filibusters of judicial nominations except in "extraordinary circumstances." However, the Senate has failed to cut off debate on other issues 57 times since then, making clear that the system has failed.
Democrats are right to scream Republican "obstructionism," but Republicans, when they were in the majority, also were right to scream Democratic obstructionism. Both sides use and abuse the rule when they are in the minority to create some supermajority fantasy the public will not understand - and then blame the other side for not getting a legislative agenda accomplished.
In last year's campaigns, House Democrats promised to change the way Congress does business - and do it within the first 100 hours they were in session. With a majority of 30-60 votes, but no supermajority requirement, the House passed its entire agenda. Despite majority support, hindered by the supermajority "cloture," the Senate has struggled all year just to pass a few bills. The American people get the feeling the Senate is a train that never quite leaves the station.
The slow train continued July 17-18 when Republicans scuttled a Democratic proposal ordering troop withdrawals from Iraq in a showdown capping an all-night debate. The 52-47 vote fell short of the 60 votes needed to invoke cloture, the 27th time this year alone that body has been unable to proceed on significant pieces of legislation. In the previous Congress (controlled by Republicans), Democrats were successful 34 times in blocking Republican legislation. Cloture has become the third rail of Congressional politics. It's time for the train to move on a different track.
Everyone has been properly complaining about obstructionism, but no one has said anything about changing the Senate rule on cloture. Since Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is talking about changing Senate rules to make it easier to restrict amendments on the floor, then why shouldn't the Senate also start the discussion about changing the cloture rule right now? It could be the difference in getting bills passed.
In early July, the minority's decision to filibuster the amendment by Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.), which stated that men and women serving in the military deserved the same amount of time at home that they served overseas, died on a 56-41 failed cloture vote - a majority supporting it but the media saying it "failed."
In 1975, the Senate reduced the number of votes required for cloture from two-thirds to three-fifths, and it should change it again. If not an end outright, the best approach to guarantee the will of the majority, why not at least drop the requirement to 55 votes - necessitating just a little bit of extra consensus to end debate. Let the will of the American people, and of a majority of the Senate itself, be acted upon.
It's time to end the cloture clog, regardless of who's in charge.
Robert Weiner, president of Robert Weiner Associates Public Affairs, worked for 16 years in the House of Representatives and for six years in the Clinton White House. John Larmett, senior policy analyst at Robert Weiner Associates, was legislative assistant/press secretary to Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.) and former Sen. Gaylord Nelson (D-Wis.).
The Senate's cloture rule defeats democracy. It lets public servants hide and obfuscate behind a parliamentary quirk never intended by the framers of the Constitution. It's time to end or significantly change the cloture rule, as was last done in 1975, and move to a true democracy so that the House and Senate equally represent the American people.
There are checks and balances, the only ones the Founding Fathers stated and intended: a presidential veto, which Congress can override with two-thirds, the only supermajority specified in the Constitution; the courts; and elections. No one ever foresaw parliamentary sleight of hand as a block of the will of the majority. If Congress wants to restore Americans' confidence in its work from the current all-time lows, it needs to allow the system to work as common sense, the Constitution and the framers dictate.
During the April-May 2005 "crisis" on judicial nominations, the "Gang of 14," seven Democratic and seven Republican Senators, agreed to oppose the constitutional or "nuclear" option and to oppose filibusters of judicial nominations except in "extraordinary circumstances." However, the Senate has failed to cut off debate on other issues 57 times since then, making clear that the system has failed.
Democrats are right to scream Republican "obstructionism," but Republicans, when they were in the majority, also were right to scream Democratic obstructionism. Both sides use and abuse the rule when they are in the minority to create some supermajority fantasy the public will not understand - and then blame the other side for not getting a legislative agenda accomplished.
In last year's campaigns, House Democrats promised to change the way Congress does business - and do it within the first 100 hours they were in session. With a majority of 30-60 votes, but no supermajority requirement, the House passed its entire agenda. Despite majority support, hindered by the supermajority "cloture," the Senate has struggled all year just to pass a few bills. The American people get the feeling the Senate is a train that never quite leaves the station.
The slow train continued July 17-18 when Republicans scuttled a Democratic proposal ordering troop withdrawals from Iraq in a showdown capping an all-night debate. The 52-47 vote fell short of the 60 votes needed to invoke cloture, the 27th time this year alone that body has been unable to proceed on significant pieces of legislation. In the previous Congress (controlled by Republicans), Democrats were successful 34 times in blocking Republican legislation. Cloture has become the third rail of Congressional politics. It's time for the train to move on a different track.
Everyone has been properly complaining about obstructionism, but no one has said anything about changing the Senate rule on cloture. Since Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is talking about changing Senate rules to make it easier to restrict amendments on the floor, then why shouldn't the Senate also start the discussion about changing the cloture rule right now? It could be the difference in getting bills passed.
In early July, the minority's decision to filibuster the amendment by Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.), which stated that men and women serving in the military deserved the same amount of time at home that they served overseas, died on a 56-41 failed cloture vote - a majority supporting it but the media saying it "failed."
In 1975, the Senate reduced the number of votes required for cloture from two-thirds to three-fifths, and it should change it again. If not an end outright, the best approach to guarantee the will of the majority, why not at least drop the requirement to 55 votes - necessitating just a little bit of extra consensus to end debate. Let the will of the American people, and of a majority of the Senate itself, be acted upon.
It's time to end the cloture clog, regardless of who's in charge.
girlfriend Is Your Ice Cream Made With
addsf345
06-15 08:00 PM
Will it be ok to change employers multiple times on EAD with in shrt span of time difference?
yes, after being a 'chicken' for so long, I changed job on AC21 six months back. And since then changed twice after that. (once forced due to economy, second time moved to a better position) in fact now I am loving the freedom that comes with EAD. Only make sure you stick to same profession (programming) other things like salary or job title etc doesn't matter. Good Luck!
yes, after being a 'chicken' for so long, I changed job on AC21 six months back. And since then changed twice after that. (once forced due to economy, second time moved to a better position) in fact now I am loving the freedom that comes with EAD. Only make sure you stick to same profession (programming) other things like salary or job title etc doesn't matter. Good Luck!
hairstyles Ice Cream Dessert, c.1959 (Red
jsb
09-21 11:43 AM
i got ead(secondary person) yestesday.and also i applied H1 B which got approved 1 week back and i want to take SSN. so my question is with
what(H1B or EAD) i should apply for SSN). Do i need to apply SSN with EAD or H1 B? which one will be better ? please let me know.
You can use either. SS office needs anything to prove that you are authorized to work in the US, which needs a SS
what(H1B or EAD) i should apply for SSN). Do i need to apply SSN with EAD or H1 B? which one will be better ? please let me know.
You can use either. SS office needs anything to prove that you are authorized to work in the US, which needs a SS
mrsr
06-19 07:43 PM
do v need to print 325A form on coloured paper ?
optimist
09-23 05:04 PM
Friends,
LUD on my I-485 (TSC) had not changed for the last two years and I now find a soft LUD of 09/15/2009. Has anyone experienced recent LUDs on their pending I-485?
I am asking because I am wondering whether USCIS has really 'touched' my file or if this is just a regular 'batch update' that happened to all applications, may be because of the new website migration.
Appreciate your answers.
Thanks.
LUD on my I-485 (TSC) had not changed for the last two years and I now find a soft LUD of 09/15/2009. Has anyone experienced recent LUDs on their pending I-485?
I am asking because I am wondering whether USCIS has really 'touched' my file or if this is just a regular 'batch update' that happened to all applications, may be because of the new website migration.
Appreciate your answers.
Thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment